In passing, I have heard some things about FLOSS development methodology over the years that have really clicked with me.
Because I am going to lay out a set of rationales for techniques of FLOSS development, I am going to start by saying that I am not read up on the Free Software Foundation's particular backstory of rationales for these ideas.
I might also add however, that there is room to independently conceive of why these ideas are good, and that that is perfectly fine, or at least very normal (and perhaps even a matter of what is ethical).
In practice, people implement FLOSS licensing strategies for all kinds of reasons, and many of the rationales for doing so are much less intentionally thought out.
And as a matter of good side effects, I think it can be very helpful to proffer up different takes on this stuff to make the path wider to peoples' preferences towards it.
This could be a very long post (if I don't get writer's block).
