I really do not like talking about AI, because I lack crucial validation of its various contextual realities. It is clear to me that there is a lot of dissociation and conflation in its overall representation in the media. It is also clear to me that it is an important topic for more than its raw technological ability.
This iteration of a tech bubble can certainly be compared to other past tech bubbles, but there is also so much more tied up in politics and power dynamics compared to what the past tech world has ever been.
It seems to me the important discussion around AI is the missing details between the lines of general distinctions of power over technology, and the abilities of the technology itself. Although there are very important discussions around the power of the technology itself, these discussions seem to be leveraged for the sake of piecing out exploitation of the technology towards conflated ends, such as overreach and monopolization in corporate power (by the technologically illiterate), or creating doomed taxation laws around impossible legal designations of AI (by the technologically illiterate).
Part of the "novelty" of the AI tech bubble is that now the vast majority of even the technologically literate people are also being told they cannot possibly understand it. I believe this is touching many reasons surrounding why this AI tech bubble has a heightened hysteria around the issue - and is actually why the discussion has a heightened importance. I think that particular importance is also how to characterize how much the whole of media has lost touch with the conversation. It's not that all the other topics are wrong though, because they're all relevant.
A much larger portion size of the conversation has to be like a magnifying glass just about cloud access, and general power over technology and information etc. You don't leave that entire conversation by the wayside, as you allow the discussion of AI to replace all other reasoning on these general issues of technology. Or, that entire conversation does not morph into a completely different conversation, in a completely different narrative, as to render it completely forgotten.
You know: How much dumb can be done under the banner of AI? . . . Seems to be the central mantra of the industry.
Industry Alternatives Always Die?
Industry Casualties
- The tech industry produces premature technological casualties that get abandoned
- The tech halts in progress
- they do not achieve their most optimally usable forms
- there exist many additional implementations that are highly usable outside of intense market dominance
- They are widely assumed to have already peaked in progress
- It is widely seen as pointless to focus on progressing them further
- the idea of continuing to focus on progressing the tech often comes with actively negative undertones, rather than a mere neglect of the idea.
Some Perspective
- coding
- UX design
- discussion forums
- human language ergonomics
- language ecosystem
- graphical infrastructure
- writing and documentation
- lessons and tutorials
- domain knowledge
No comments:
Post a Comment